<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DREAM Act Re-introduced on March 26th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thevisabulletin.com/2009/03/dream-act-re-introduced-on-march-26th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thevisabulletin.com/2009/03/dream-act-re-introduced-on-march-26th/</link>
	<description>Immigration Law Updates</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:32:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cris</title>
		<link>http://thevisabulletin.com/2009/03/dream-act-re-introduced-on-march-26th/comment-page-1/#comment-15239</link>
		<dc:creator>cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevisabulletin.com/?p=376#comment-15239</guid>
		<description>you dont have to be selfish ! this people deserve a chance ! there is nothing wrong with a kid trying to have a better future in here ! &lt;a href=&quot;#comment-5473&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@CeCe &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you dont have to be selfish ! this people deserve a chance ! there is nothing wrong with a kid trying to have a better future in here ! <a href="#comment-5473" rel="nofollow">@CeCe </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://thevisabulletin.com/2009/03/dream-act-re-introduced-on-march-26th/comment-page-1/#comment-10295</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 04:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevisabulletin.com/?p=376#comment-10295</guid>
		<description>These non-citizens were brought here and kept here (while under the age of consent/accountability [18 years old]). The question is, do they have the right to enter the workforce? Should they be given the right to work and make a proper living? Most of these young people have been upstanding members of their communities and superb students who are graduating or have graduated with excellence and honors in their field of study. Should their dreams turn to dust because whoever brought them here didn&#039;t bother to go through proper legalities? Why punish someone for a crime they didn&#039;t commit, but rather victims of?

 A majority of these individuals have lived here their entire life and consider this country as their home. They consider themselves AMERICAN. They have little to no knowledge of their parent&#039;s or relatives&#039; home country. So why would we not grant them limited access to the things that this country provides for a better living that most of its own citizens take for granted?
            They don&#039;t realize that denying these undocumented students can result in an increase in crime. How? If you&#039;re not able to work on-books (legally with a SSN#), you will work off-books earning money (TAX-FREE!). Earning money in this country that&#039;s tax-free might land you in jail. Secondly, if these individuals cannot find a legitimate off-books job, they will find themselves involved in illegal activities just to make a living. Get the drift yet?
            I&#039;ve heard people say that this would cause an increase in people jumping the border to come here. I say &quot;No! It won&#039;t&quot;. Why not? If they put a limit on the act itself stating that the law covers children who came here within a specific time frame, anyone outside of that time frame would be considered ineligible. I do have to say that the one part of the act I do disagree with is giving these individuals amnesty during those six years. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s right. You do the crime, you do the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These non-citizens were brought here and kept here (while under the age of consent/accountability [18 years old]). The question is, do they have the right to enter the workforce? Should they be given the right to work and make a proper living? Most of these young people have been upstanding members of their communities and superb students who are graduating or have graduated with excellence and honors in their field of study. Should their dreams turn to dust because whoever brought them here didn&#8217;t bother to go through proper legalities? Why punish someone for a crime they didn&#8217;t commit, but rather victims of?</p>
<p> A majority of these individuals have lived here their entire life and consider this country as their home. They consider themselves AMERICAN. They have little to no knowledge of their parent&#8217;s or relatives&#8217; home country. So why would we not grant them limited access to the things that this country provides for a better living that most of its own citizens take for granted?<br />
            They don&#8217;t realize that denying these undocumented students can result in an increase in crime. How? If you&#8217;re not able to work on-books (legally with a SSN#), you will work off-books earning money (TAX-FREE!). Earning money in this country that&#8217;s tax-free might land you in jail. Secondly, if these individuals cannot find a legitimate off-books job, they will find themselves involved in illegal activities just to make a living. Get the drift yet?<br />
            I&#8217;ve heard people say that this would cause an increase in people jumping the border to come here. I say &#8220;No! It won&#8217;t&#8221;. Why not? If they put a limit on the act itself stating that the law covers children who came here within a specific time frame, anyone outside of that time frame would be considered ineligible. I do have to say that the one part of the act I do disagree with is giving these individuals amnesty during those six years. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s right. You do the crime, you do the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CeCe</title>
		<link>http://thevisabulletin.com/2009/03/dream-act-re-introduced-on-march-26th/comment-page-1/#comment-5473</link>
		<dc:creator>CeCe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 16:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevisabulletin.com/?p=376#comment-5473</guid>
		<description>HELL NO. THIS ACT SHOULD NOT BE PASS MY PARENTS ARE LEGAL IMMIGRANTS WHO WAITED YEARS UPON YEARS TO GET THERE PAPER... THEREFORE IT SHOULD NOT CHANGE I DONT GIVE A RATS BEHIND IF YOU IN SCHOOL GOT A LAW DEGREE OR WHATEVER THATS YOU PROBLEM RULES ARE RULES.... THAT GOES FOR THE WHOLE PUNCH LATINO...AFRICAN...ASIAN...SWEEDEN...UK.... I DONT CARE....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HELL NO. THIS ACT SHOULD NOT BE PASS MY PARENTS ARE LEGAL IMMIGRANTS WHO WAITED YEARS UPON YEARS TO GET THERE PAPER&#8230; THEREFORE IT SHOULD NOT CHANGE I DONT GIVE A RATS BEHIND IF YOU IN SCHOOL GOT A LAW DEGREE OR WHATEVER THATS YOU PROBLEM RULES ARE RULES&#8230;. THAT GOES FOR THE WHOLE PUNCH LATINO&#8230;AFRICAN&#8230;ASIAN&#8230;SWEEDEN&#8230;UK&#8230;. I DONT CARE&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AduttyForurgy</title>
		<link>http://thevisabulletin.com/2009/03/dream-act-re-introduced-on-march-26th/comment-page-1/#comment-5372</link>
		<dc:creator>AduttyForurgy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 07:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevisabulletin.com/?p=376#comment-5372</guid>
		<description>replica designer handbag http://topcitystyle.com/abercrombie-and-fitch-men-brand63.html vans discontinued shoes &lt;a href=&quot;http://topcitystyle.com/42-on-sale-size23.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;new york pet fashion week&lt;/a&gt; why do we wear shoes
http://topcitystyle.com/yellow-lilac-women-s-tops-color196.html formal fashion &lt;a href=&quot;http://topcitystyle.com/s-dressy-tops-size10.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;burton snowboard clothes&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>replica designer handbag <a href="http://topcitystyle.com/abercrombie-and-fitch-men-brand63.html" rel="nofollow">http://topcitystyle.com/abercrombie-and-fitch-men-brand63.html</a> vans discontinued shoes <a href="http://topcitystyle.com/42-on-sale-size23.html" rel="nofollow">new york pet fashion week</a> why do we wear shoes<br />
<a href="http://topcitystyle.com/yellow-lilac-women-s-tops-color196.html" rel="nofollow">http://topcitystyle.com/yellow-lilac-women-s-tops-color196.html</a> formal fashion <a href="http://topcitystyle.com/s-dressy-tops-size10.html" rel="nofollow">burton snowboard clothes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Britt</title>
		<link>http://thevisabulletin.com/2009/03/dream-act-re-introduced-on-march-26th/comment-page-1/#comment-3841</link>
		<dc:creator>Britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevisabulletin.com/?p=376#comment-3841</guid>
		<description>I feel that the DREAM act should be passed.  It will be helping those who came here illegaly yes, but they did not knowingly do it.  For some of these people their parents brought them here when they were too young to remember anything.  They have lived here their whole lives not knowing anything about their &quot;home&quot; country and sending them back could be psychologically damaging to them.  Besides it is not like we are saying here are your papers now go do whatever you want.  We are making them work for it wheather it be through getting an education or serving our country they are working for it.  And the act will not be helping those who are not an asset to our country or economy.  If we help these people to get a higher education they will be able to spend more money and help our economy go up.  Not only that but we will have more qualified and educated people in our workforce which is good for everybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that the DREAM act should be passed.  It will be helping those who came here illegaly yes, but they did not knowingly do it.  For some of these people their parents brought them here when they were too young to remember anything.  They have lived here their whole lives not knowing anything about their &#8220;home&#8221; country and sending them back could be psychologically damaging to them.  Besides it is not like we are saying here are your papers now go do whatever you want.  We are making them work for it wheather it be through getting an education or serving our country they are working for it.  And the act will not be helping those who are not an asset to our country or economy.  If we help these people to get a higher education they will be able to spend more money and help our economy go up.  Not only that but we will have more qualified and educated people in our workforce which is good for everybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Response to the Ridiculous: A Measured Rant in Resonse to an Idiotic Argument Against the DREAM ACT &#124; Legal 411 .</title>
		<link>http://thevisabulletin.com/2009/03/dream-act-re-introduced-on-march-26th/comment-page-1/#comment-3201</link>
		<dc:creator>Response to the Ridiculous: A Measured Rant in Resonse to an Idiotic Argument Against the DREAM ACT &#124; Legal 411 .</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 05:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevisabulletin.com/?p=376#comment-3201</guid>
		<description>[...] A twitter tweet lead me to this ridiculous commentary by a blogger on &#8220;BloggerBase.com&#8221; I would normally just leave a comment there but the idiot who wrote the piece didn&#8217;t want anonymous comments (which is OK by me, I sign my work) and the site won&#8217;t let you use your name unless you join. I do not see the reason to join, at least for now. So here Mr.J Malmberg is my response to your drivel. Your sad and embarrassing post on what is &#8220;wrong&#8221; with the DREAM ACT. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A twitter tweet lead me to this ridiculous commentary by a blogger on &#8220;BloggerBase.com&#8221; I would normally just leave a comment there but the idiot who wrote the piece didn&#8217;t want anonymous comments (which is OK by me, I sign my work) and the site won&#8217;t let you use your name unless you join. I do not see the reason to join, at least for now. So here Mr.J Malmberg is my response to your drivel. Your sad and embarrassing post on what is &#8220;wrong&#8221; with the DREAM ACT. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dilse321</title>
		<link>http://thevisabulletin.com/2009/03/dream-act-re-introduced-on-march-26th/comment-page-1/#comment-3063</link>
		<dc:creator>Dilse321</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevisabulletin.com/?p=376#comment-3063</guid>
		<description>In response to olive: I dont believe that the kids who are not attending college should get a chance at legalising their status, unless they can prove that they are financially stable and have excellent moral character. 

The mistake of the amnesty in 1986 was that it was given to everybody who applied and was not carefully monitored. I know people who obtained their &quot;papers&quot; by posing as agricultural workers even though they never set foot on a field. This example only proves that the goverment was lazy and took the easy way out when trying to get rid of the problem of illegal immigration. As a result, we had a bunch of people who really didnt deserve to be here taking adavantage of our goverment programs milking every possible benefit out of tax payers. What is worse, is that the problem wasnt solved and now it has doubled in size.

In my opinion the goverment should legalize only those people who are deserving of the privilege. People who abide by the rules, and who can prove that they are here to work and raise their families in an honest way and by following the law. Perhaps most importantly, people who are here to improve their life not only economically, but socially as well.  By this I mean people who take interest in adopting the american culture,learn our language and follow our laws without losing their identity.
 
The majority of the people who come from latin american countries do not place a high value on the education of their children because they themselves are not educated. Perhaps knowing that attending college will give their children a chance to be legal, will push them to educate themselves and push their children harder to get educated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to olive: I dont believe that the kids who are not attending college should get a chance at legalising their status, unless they can prove that they are financially stable and have excellent moral character. </p>
<p>The mistake of the amnesty in 1986 was that it was given to everybody who applied and was not carefully monitored. I know people who obtained their &#8220;papers&#8221; by posing as agricultural workers even though they never set foot on a field. This example only proves that the goverment was lazy and took the easy way out when trying to get rid of the problem of illegal immigration. As a result, we had a bunch of people who really didnt deserve to be here taking adavantage of our goverment programs milking every possible benefit out of tax payers. What is worse, is that the problem wasnt solved and now it has doubled in size.</p>
<p>In my opinion the goverment should legalize only those people who are deserving of the privilege. People who abide by the rules, and who can prove that they are here to work and raise their families in an honest way and by following the law. Perhaps most importantly, people who are here to improve their life not only economically, but socially as well.  By this I mean people who take interest in adopting the american culture,learn our language and follow our laws without losing their identity.</p>
<p>The majority of the people who come from latin american countries do not place a high value on the education of their children because they themselves are not educated. Perhaps knowing that attending college will give their children a chance to be legal, will push them to educate themselves and push their children harder to get educated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olive</title>
		<link>http://thevisabulletin.com/2009/03/dream-act-re-introduced-on-march-26th/comment-page-1/#comment-2965</link>
		<dc:creator>olive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevisabulletin.com/?p=376#comment-2965</guid>
		<description>I want to support the dream act because there are so many children living here illegally due to the fact that their parents came here on holiday visas and overstayed.  These kids were placed in NY public school and some private school, completed high school and are working off the books. Some of these very kids are fed up and frustrated because even if they are send back to their birth country, have no ties there and will be lost.  So what if they havent gone to college, shouldnt they also get a chance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to support the dream act because there are so many children living here illegally due to the fact that their parents came here on holiday visas and overstayed.  These kids were placed in NY public school and some private school, completed high school and are working off the books. Some of these very kids are fed up and frustrated because even if they are send back to their birth country, have no ties there and will be lost.  So what if they havent gone to college, shouldnt they also get a chance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arshil</title>
		<link>http://thevisabulletin.com/2009/03/dream-act-re-introduced-on-march-26th/comment-page-1/#comment-2956</link>
		<dc:creator>Arshil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 17:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevisabulletin.com/?p=376#comment-2956</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2954&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@riz_md&lt;/a&gt; 
riz_md, Based on everything I&#039;ve read (although I haven&#039;t read the proposed statute itself), my understanding is that these persons to whom the Dream Act would apply would be able to qualify if they 1) spend 2 years in military service, OR 2) complete 2 years of college, OR 3) have 2 years of credit in a 4-year college program. 

As I understand it, if they have the proper amount of schooling, they can qualify and will not need the military service. But again, I have not read the proposed statute, itself, and it is entirely possible that the language could change during debates in Congress. 

So, please do not rely on my thoughts or construe what I am saying as legal advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2954" rel="nofollow">@riz_md</a><br />
riz_md, Based on everything I&#8217;ve read (although I haven&#8217;t read the proposed statute itself), my understanding is that these persons to whom the Dream Act would apply would be able to qualify if they 1) spend 2 years in military service, OR 2) complete 2 years of college, OR 3) have 2 years of credit in a 4-year college program. </p>
<p>As I understand it, if they have the proper amount of schooling, they can qualify and will not need the military service. But again, I have not read the proposed statute, itself, and it is entirely possible that the language could change during debates in Congress. </p>
<p>So, please do not rely on my thoughts or construe what I am saying as legal advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riz_md</title>
		<link>http://thevisabulletin.com/2009/03/dream-act-re-introduced-on-march-26th/comment-page-1/#comment-2954</link>
		<dc:creator>riz_md</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thevisabulletin.com/?p=376#comment-2954</guid>
		<description>I am wondering that it would be necessary for these children to serve in a military for 2 years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am wondering that it would be necessary for these children to serve in a military for 2 years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

